Many know and still venerate the poet who was born as Christopher Murray Grieve in Langholm, Dumfriesshire, in 1892 and who died as the renowned Hugh MacDiarmid in Edinburgh in 1978. He was peripatetic in ideas and in his homes, living in various parts of Scotland following service in the Royal Army Medical Corps in World War I. After the war he settled for a while in Montrose and began writing poetry there. His Northern Numbers, an anthology which ran to three volumes appeared while he was resident in Angus. He also anonymously reported on and praised his own Scottish Nation when in appeared in 1923, a handy journalistic trick. (His Montrose residence was in two stints, the longer of which began in 1920. He had also very briefly lived in Forfar in 1913.)
Never a slacker, the young poet became editor and reporter of The Montrose Review, a justice of the peace (from February 1926) and a local councillor. He was elected to the Water Committee, Dorward’s House of Refuge Representatives; he was the sole councillor on the Montrose School Management Committee; and he also sat on the Public Library Committee. He later called himself ‘the only Socialist Town Councillor in Montrose’.
Among the recorded polictical acts of the young firebrand in Montrose was a hearty condemnation of the low wages paid by the Town Council to its employees in May 1923. He also staged (and reported on positively) a 'No More War' demonstration at the Town House in August 1923. Many of the pieces by the poet in the newspaper can no longer be identified because all are anonymous, but his trademark tongue shines through on certain radical issues.
It was while staying in the burgh that he began his metamporphisis into the redoubtable Hugh MacDiarmid, socialist, nationalist, and scourge of mealy-minded thinkers. He remained in Montrose in 1929, when he decamped to London, and during his time there made many friends, such as the local sculptor William Lamb, who created a bust of the writer.
However, not everyone in Montrose was enamoured with Grieve/MacDiarmid, and there is a fascinating piece in his erstwhile home, The Montrose Review, dated Friday 22 April 1922, which gives a partisan appraisal of the man through a particular local lens. It is interesting as a snapshot of the status of local politics in the early 20th century, but moreso perhaps as a reflection about the ambivalent reputation which the poet left behind in his adopted home in Angus. I reprint it below in full,
The Audacity of C. M. Grieve.
His Experience on Montrose Town Council
Once again C. M. Grieve has burst into print. In case anyone has never heard of C. M. Grieve - and no doubt there are many - let us hasten to explain that he is a writer and piet. One of the leaders of the Scottish Renaissance school, he sometimes attemots to hide his identity under the name of Hugh McDiarmid [sic].He was a journalist in Montrose before going to Lindon, and for a time served on Montrose Town Council, occupying the post of Hospital Master.In a Sunday contemporary he has an article entitled 'When I served on Montrose Town Council.' If there is one thing that can be said about C. M. Grieve it is that he is by no means modest. The article in question bears the sub-heading: 'I was brainier than my colleagues but they taught me a lot.'
The article appears to be a tribute to the work done by Town Councils in Scotland. We say 'appears to be,' because opening with a reference to Goethe's Faust, he goes on to refer to the Scottish National Party, the work of Town Councils, the Local Government (Scotland) Act, the evils of centralisation consequent thereon, party politics, advice which he was given but did not take, the new Scottish movement, and so on.Mr Grieve explains that he 'came to devote himself to public service in Montrose - as a Town Councillor, a Parish Councillor, a Justice of the Peace, a trustee of public mortifications - much in the spirit in which Faust applied himself to land reclamation.' He was 'tired of detached intelectualism, and could no longer live by my own hump like a camel.'He rightly contends that work on the Town Council is 'an invaluable corrective to top-lofty ideas and paper schemes. It brings them to the test of actual practice.'Then comes the statement which reveals this 'well-known Scots writer and poet' in all his glory.'I was agreeably conscious when I was first elected that intellectuals of my sort were not usually members of such bodies - that I was far brainier and better educated than most of my colleagues. But I was not slow in finding out that the least intellectual of these often had a measure of shrewd commonsense and practicality - to say nothing of technical knowedge and first-hand experience in certain directions - with which I could never hope to compete. I ended by having a solid respect for most of them.'His indictment of the failure of Town Councils to resist the Local Government Act will find many supporters. He rightly contends that: - 'The failure of the Town Councils of Scotland to stand solidly together and resist this whittling-away of their powers in favour of far less democratic bodies at the instance of an English-controlled Parliament was a gross betrayal of the interests of Scottish Local Government.'
Coming to the more local aspect of this matter he goes on: - 'In all sorts of matters needless delays were caused , and a great deal of unnecessary expenditure incurred through the necessity of sending deputations to London and promoting local Bills there. And the extent to which we were continually over-ruled, interfered with, and frustrated by officials in London with no knowledge of the local circumstances, even in matters which called for expert local understanding, beggared belief.'He referes to the introduction of party politics into local government affairs. It is our opinion, and no doubt Mr Grive will agree, that party politics and local government should be kept entirely apart. The work of the community should be kept entirely apart. The work of the community should be carried on without any respect to party labels.''I thoroughly enjoyed my term of municipal service; he goes on. 'The duties of Town Councils are multifarious and bring the Town Councillors into touch with his constituents in so many different and intimate ways as to constitute a regular education in themselves.'' "You ought to stick to poetry, Grieve," ' I was sometimes told, "petty local affairs aren't your line. Anybody can look after them.'Can they? Remarks such as these generally mean that the speaker in question was afraid I saw too clearly through his little game.'Public service deserves - and demands - the best any man ot woman, be they the high-brow, the middle-brow, or low-brow can give, and the Town Councils of Scotland have never lacked disinterested service.'There is little gratitude in public life, and very often measures have to be forced through against popular prejudice.'Even now, shorn of so many of their appropriate powers, the Town Councils of Scotland stand for a distinctive system of local government which cannot be further Anglicised withour increasing detriment to Scotland.'
See Further:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/181416548586190/posts/5686861081375015/
How Montrose Became Centre of A Left-Wing Scottish Cultural Revolution
Scott Lyall, ' "Genius in A Provincial Town": MacDiarmid's Poetry and Politics in Montrose,' Scottish Studies Review 5.2 (Autumn 2004), 41-55.
